|
Fundamental
Steps
for Reducing
Energy,
Operating
Cost,
and
Improving
Performance
in a Compressed
Air
System
by: Scot Foss, Plant Air
Technology
The following are the
required steps of action that should be taken to identify and quantify
the constituents of demand including waste and inappropriate usage,
current energy, and the annual operating cost per condition. In taking
these steps, you will also significantly reduce the operating cost of
the system by 25-35% of the current condition. The steps are prioritized
in the correct order of sequence. Please keep in mind that this is a
simple, straightforward approach. It is the author’s intent that these
actions can be taken with a minimum cost and optimum result. Large
systems with multiple compressor rooms, multiple entry points, multiple
pressures, or complex compressors and controls will require special
attention or the assistance of a professional, experienced auditor.
1. Learn
how to get the compressors into a base load & trim condition at the
desired supply pressure. Understand cascading different types and
control arrangements to trim down more than one compressor. It is highly
unlikely that you will be successful getting the system to operate this
way with any of the compressors in modulation. In the event of
centrifugals, you will want to fully load the base compressors on the
natural curve and modulate the last compressor. Stagger the set points
on the last two centrifugals assuming the turn down will be equal to or
less than the throttling capability of the two units. If you have
multiple compressor rooms, base load one room and then follow the above
instructions to trim in the other room. Signals may be a complication.
You will likely shut off a compressor in the exercise at least a good
deal of the time.
2. Determine
the demand based on the compressor loading in the no load, low load, and
normal operating loads. You will want to get some diversity of top to
bottom in each condition. Measure the energy and determine the cost at
the various conditions including dryers, pumps, fans, etc. Apply the
hours of service for each condition against the electrical cost.
Distribute maintenance, operators, inspection, depreciation, inventory,
rental, and water costs proportionate to time per condition
3. While
doing the low load test, walk the production floor and check to see what
is on that may also be on during the low and normal production loads.
Estimate this volume and subtract it from the total low load. The
balance is the leak load. Make sure that the valves and solenoids are
open on the production machinery with the equipment off and reevaluate
the low load. The difference should be added to the low leak load during
production hours. You now have the leak load for the various conditions.
You can also determine how much of the leaks is in the piping and how
much is on the production machinery.
4. While
you are in the plant, check the critical pressure applications and other
regulated samples and determine if the regulators are adjusted to the
supply pressure (not necessarily seated). Between leaks, no regulator
applications, and tracking or max set regulator applications; estimate
the percentage of total demand, which is not regulated. Ratio the
absolute pressures or weights between the current average supply
pressure and the lowest that you think that you can operate at after
retrofitting the point of use applications to reduce the differential
pressure and high rate of change applications that cause the pressure to
drop in the system. These are cause and effect applications. The
difference in the ratio between where you are at current and where you
can operate at with the demand improvements is expressed as a
percentage. Multiply the percentage times the total demand, which is not
regulated. This will produce the artificial demand in volume. You have
now quantified the well applied production, leaks, and artificial demand
in low load. Do the same for the other conditions. This is the beginning
of quantifying the constituents of demand. Since you know the cost of
air for each condition on an hourly basis, you can apply cost to these
individual issues by condition.
5. During
low and normal production identify inappropriate applications for air
such as open blowing, aspiration, cooling, etc. Quantify them and break
them out from the production volume in the constituents of demand. We
have now separated the things we can change from the unchangeables in
production.
6. Install
a master/local signal header and learn how to use it. Adjust the
compressors to the desired demand pressure. The differential pressure
across the clean up equipment and aftercoolers will be absorbed in the
drive energy at .5% per 1 psig compared to having the system drop a
proportional amount of the delta pressure. Make sure you adjust the
compressors for the demand pressure required, not the previous supply
pressure.
7. Learn
the five concepts of storage and how to measure negative rate of change
events in the system. Install the desired storage required to handle the
demand events at an acceptable pressure drop. Adjust the trim portion of
the supply to create the required control storage so that you can
operate at the lowest pressure possible and only drop to the minimum
demand pressure when handling events with control storage. Minimize the
differential pressure and optimize the capacity of control storage to
keep the base power down. Make sure that the storage is sufficient to
handle a compressor failure and the time and allowable pressure decay to
get the back up compressor up to full load without dropping below the
minimum acceptable demand pressure. This will assure that the back up
compressor does not turn on inadvertently. Note the change in power.
8. Install
a demand controller and make sure that the pressure drop is minimal
(less than 2-3 psig at full flow). Adjust it to the minimum demand
pressure plus the control variance (should not be more than 1-2 psig at
worst). You may have to make a supply pressure control adjustment to
correct so that you have sufficient control storage without tracking the
controller on supply during your largest event.
9. Use
an ultrasonic leak detector for leak benchmarking and identification.
First pass, tag enough leaks to reduce the leak load by 50%. Tag them by
color code base on large and medium leaks. Fix the leaks and make sure
that an appropriate amount of supply energy is reduced. You may have to
review the supply profile and readjust the set points. Review the types
of leaks you found and identify what changes in supply items such hose,
hose fittings, assembly techniques, push lock fittings, tube,
disconnects, filters, regulators, and thread compounds need to be made
to minimize more similar leaks in the future. Establish the first pass
benchmark and revisit the value every couple of weeks and bring the low
load value back to benchmark. When you get comfortable with the level,
lower its smaller percentage than the last time as it will be more
difficult to maintain.
10. Apply
low pressure positive displacement blower at all open blowing, sparging,
and cooling applications where possible. Replace the balance of open
blowing with low volume, high thrust nozzles
11. Apply
all checked and metered, dedicated storage to all points of use which
have higher volume intermittent usage. Adjust metering to flatten the
load as seen by the supply
12. Check
the demand controller for accuracy and sensitivity. Lower the unit if
possible. Check the supply system again and adjust set points and the
system’s profile as needed.
13. Benchmark
the demand flow for the various use conditions making sure that there is
no significant increase. In the event that an increase occurs over
previous benchmarks. Review the demand analysis procedures from the past
and take corrective actions where needed.
Even a fumbling attempt at this approach
will net a substantial reduction in total cost and energy. There are
many areas that have not been explored in improving the system because
of their complexity in diagnosis and solution including coincidental
demand, load shaping, a variety of multiple compressor controls,
information management, and unit interface.
Reprinted
with permission from R. Scot Foss, president of Plant Air Technology,
Charlotte, N.C., a company specializing in system auditing and design. This
article is based on his book, "Compressed Air System Solution."
A
portion of the proceeds from sales of the book is donated to children’s
charities. To order a
copy of the book, please
contact Southern Corporation. |